Howard Webb, the chief executive of PGMOL, is scheduled to meet with Mark Ashton, the chief executive of Ipswich Town, following his criticism of VAR for a controversial decision in his team’s draw with Leicester.
Mark Ashton, the chief executive of Ipswich Town, is scheduled to meet with Howard Webb, the head of PGMOL, to request clarification regarding the denial of a “stonewall penalty” against Leicester.
On Saturday, Ipswich and Leicester played to a 1-1 draw. Jordan Ayew scored a late equaliser for the Tractor Boys, but they believed they should have been awarded a penalty after Abdul Fatawu collided with Conor Chaplin.
However, referee Tim Robinson did not indicate the location of the incident, and the video assistant referee (VAR) did not intervene or suggest that he reevaluate the situation. Ashton and manager Kieran McKenna both expressed their dissatisfaction with the decision following the match.
Ashton has now criticised the system, as it was the fourth VAR decision that Ipswich believes has gone against them this season. Ashton stated to BBC Radio Suffolk, “From an entertainment standpoint, I am of the opinion that the game is harmed by VAR, based on my observations.”
“I only request consistency in refereeing and VAR.” Consistency has not been observed. I and my colleagues do not personally believe that we have observed consistency throughout the events. Consistency is the sole criteria that I evaluate. At present, I am mired in confusion.
He went on to say, “I actually contacted Howard when we were 1-0 up because I had a premonition of the outcome.” I have been involved in this activity for an extended period of time, and I could sense it.
“I sent him a simplistic message in which I asked, ‘Look, can we speak directly after the game?'” We conversed immediately following the game, and some of that conversation must remain confidential due to the possibility of me being charged, banned from the stadium, or fined. None of these outcomes are concerning.
Ashton is scheduled to meet with Webb to address the penalty incident that occurred against Leicester. “The culmination of the interesting conversation with Howard on Saturday night was that we will meet this week at Portman Road to discuss it,” said the representative.
We require responses. It is imperative that we comprehend. At present, I am unable to comprehend certain refereeing decisions and am perplexed as to why we were not awarded a penalty.
“I have observed former referees expressing their belief that the incident was not a penalty, but their assertions are unfounded.” Please refrain from supporting your erstwhile colleagues; it was a penalty for stonewalling.
Ipswich is presently ranked 18th in the Premier League and has yet to secure a victory this season. This month, they are confronted with an exceptionally challenging schedule of fixtures, including a voyage to Tottenham and a match against Manchester United in Ruben Amorim’s inaugural game as manager.
